Marketing's collective memory
checked and graded so you can build on evidence
- CollectionIncreasing creator marketing efficiency in 2027
- CollectionHow to earn AI search citations
- CollectionWhat are the key marketing trends for 2027?Coming soon
- CollectionWhat are the latest benchmarks for media-buying channels?Coming soon
- CollectionHow to optimize for AI searchComing soon
- CollectionHow to work with creators in 2026?Coming soon
- Citation & visibility trackingTrendOnly 12% of links cited by AI assistants show up in Google's top 10 search results for the same prompt
- Email contentIdeaHyper-personalised content lifted site conversion to 2.9% from 0.5% and email click-through to 3.4% from 1.8%
- Shortlisting creatorsIdeaBetter audience-brand fit nearly doubled the odds of conversion
Cards — All tiers
883
Each card
has a reliability tier
Because not every insight
is worth an action
Stacy's Brain exists because a vendor survey and a peer-reviewed experiment get quoted with the same confidence — and they shouldn't be. Vendor reports, case studies, and academic papers all use different methods and samples; we grade the difference so you don't have to guess it.
Browse our evidence-based collectionsTrending insight
collections
Rated marketing evidence, inside Claude
Ask any assistant for a marketing benchmark
and you'll get a number.
You won't get the part that matters: that it came from a company selling the thing the number promotes, that the sample was their own clients, and that it's two years old.
Connect Stacy's Brain and every marketing number Claude gives you comes back with a reliability tier, the study behind it, and what that study doesn't cover.
Turn our stats into
a plan you can defend
Browse, save, share – for free
- Search by metric, channel, or the question you're trying to answer
- Bookmark and create insight collections
- Add personal notes to each insight
- And if you need – make your folders public